Buddha

Critique of Ruth benedict’s, “A Defense of example Relativism”

Extra Credit I
PHL 142-875
Susan Phelps
July 30, 2009

Susan Phelps

Critique of Ruth Benedict’s, “A Defense of incorrupt Relativism”

In the article, “A Defense of Moral Relativism”, Ruth Benedict, an anthropologist, defends the concept of Moral Relativism. The major theme in this article was that virtuousity is ethnicly relative. Moral relativism is the position that virtuous or ethical positions do not reflect fair game or moral truths, but instead make claims to hearty and cultural events. Benedict argues for the relatively of moral standards from the standpoint of cultural anthropology. Standards of what atomic number 18 normal in a culture argon a function of their social organization and that these standards usually interchange from culture to culture. Cultural Relativism is the principle that an individual’s beliefs and activities are determined by his or her own culture. Benedict defines morality as mores, socially approved tradition. She states that what one society whitethorn approve as disgraceful may be viewed as acceptable in another culture. Culture shapes values and moral rules vary from one society to another.



She asserts that these standards define what are secure and bad morally respective for each culture (137).
Anthropologist Benedict claims that “a convenient term for socially approved customs” having no place in the objective universal solid ground (137). She cites different values of extra cultures, claiming they demonstratively prove

1.

Susan Phelps

the anti-supremacy of any particular ethical principle. Each culture has its...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper