A Thesis on Qualitative Evaluation of the USA PATRIOT Act

C. The USA patriot bet, which originated as H.R. 2975 in the House of Representatives and S. 1510 in the Senate, was signed into constabulary by President George W. Bush on October 9, 2001 (Doyle, 2002; Summary of USA nationalist crook?, 2002). The U.S. Senate voted for the bill, 91-1, with only Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin) opposing it. The House of Representatives voted 357-66 to pass the PATRIOT affect (Williams, 2002).

According to Pike (2002), the USA PATRIOT Act (Public Law 107-56) is an extensive and complex piece of regulation. In general, its provisions are intended to make it easier for the government to investigate and suffice to terrorist activities, actors, and threats. On its face, the PATRIOT Act was designed to facilitate honor enforcement activities at the national and international level in evidence to prevent a repetition of the tragic events of September 11, 2001 (Poynder, 2002). It was enacted afterward President Bush proclaimed in a countrywide televisions broadcast after September 11, 2001 that the U.S. would adopt strict measures to protection the internal stability of the nation (USA PATRIOT Act?, 2002).

most immediately following the passage of the Act, human rights and civil rights organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), objected to heterogeneous provisions of the Act and charged that it was far too sweeping in allowing government law enforcement and other agencies to gain access to inf

Most qualitative pedantic research is literature-based, though in marketing and other fields, interviews and/or case studies, observations, and so frontward whitethorn be apply (Leedy and Ormrod, 2001). Babbie (1986) states that in identifying materials appropriate for cellular inclusion in a study that is based on previously published literature, all kinds of literature can be used before a research study is begun. Such materials in like manner can be employed effectively during the study itself, bestow to its forward thrust. Today, given the proliferation of electronic databases and the accessibility of the Internet and its various search engines (e.g., Google, EBSCO, Infotrac, and so on), qualitative research is easier than ever before.

No longer do researchers need to pour over two-fold volumes of the Reader's Guide to Periodical Literature to identify materials that they remunerationl may be appropriate for their studies, then go to the "Stacks" in the library to locate articles, and then read the materials thoroughly. Many academic as well as popular publications are on tap(predicate) in full text on the Internet, both(prenominal) unaffixed of charge and others (such as The Wall Street Journal) for a fee (Leedy & Ormrod, 2001).

The purpose of the study, thitherfore, is to employ a case study methodology to examine the actual and potential effects of the PATRIOT Act and to compare this Act to other broad and sweeping legislation and laws in the U.S. and abroad, both historically and in the present day. It is expect that such a comparison will reveal that this role of legislation and law accords to government and an Executive Branch ungodly powers that are vulnerable to abuse, leading to violations of the civic and human rights of individuals. A central thrust of the study is to identify those aspects of the PATRIOT Act that are likely to foster such abuses.

While there is little doubt that the War on Terror has necessitated some type of restructuring of the ways in which the United Sta
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!