Summary of

In her article “May the Best Man or Woman Win,” Miriam Schulman discusses how equality is not treated reasonablyly delinquent to the divers(prenominal)ly managed preferences in college admissions; she also defends the importance of considering the race as a morally accepted criterion. Almost in all college admission, equal students crave to be handled fairly; however, every hotshot has a moral proof to prefer some criteria upon others. Hence, students admitted low affirmative action have been always a minority compared to others. One of the leading preferences applied a lot in the highest learning institutions, is then legacy admissions; although apparently unfair, it was proved to be needed for the “financial continuity” of the universities. Casting further germane(predicate) criteria, race appears to be as fitting as every other preference. Yet, ability is still seemingly one of the most admitted.



Thought to be the most objective way to judge a student, academic ability is not as fair as it appears to be; grading systems are very different among schools and no “standardized test” can reflect the objective abilities of students coming from different natures. Nonetheless, physical, musical, social and a lot of respective(a) talents are also treated as relative criteria in college admission. Such measurements are necessary to expect the student’s future position. Dealing with this unethical diversity to be with no significant benefit, ethnicity, gender and race take place. Socializing with physically different people is biased as useless, while donjon with different races has been proved to enhance the “dialogue” in universities and to helper us realize ‘all’ the community’s problems. If you ask to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!