Running Head : COMPARISON OF Immigration LawComparison of Immigration Policies in the get together States and Australia[Name][Affiliation]In August 2002 , a special story , neighborly Rights and Citizenship : An International Comparison , about immigration policies in costless democratic states including Australia , United States , and Canada was published by Michael Fix and Laureen Laglagaron resile the Urban Institute - an independent non-partisan which analyzes problems and policies in America and some other countries ADDIN EN .CITE 2About UI20089 May2008Urban Institutehttp / entanglement .urban .org /about /index .cfm (2008 . The report explored widely distributed trends in immigration policies in liberal democratic statesThe report Social Rights and Citizenship discussed different access provided in countries including Australia and the United States such as persistent status , rationing benefits , indirect exclude to benefits restrictions to contributory benefit , public sector appointment , esoteric sector employment , and self-employment . It also included the anti-discrimination policies and their policy recommendations ADDIN EN .CITE Fix7Michael FixLaureen LaglagaronSocial Rights and Citizenship : An International Comparison1-532002August 2002Urban Institutehttp /www .urban .org /Uploa dedPDF /410545_SocialRights .pdf8 May 2008 (Fix and Laglagaron 2002Australia and the United States offer an unlikely open access to its immigrants such as extensive restriction market rights to legal non-citizens Generally , the migrants are characterized with comparatively number one education , from ethnic and racial minorities , non-citizen status , and compromise the wear upon force . The immigrant countries saw the importance of promoting policies for the social rights such as ration benefits for citizenship . Australia and the United States are some of the countries that offer employment for immigrants non-contributory social welfare programs like cash transfer , heath care , and housing assistance contributory social indemnification programs such as unemployment insurance and pension programs and selected social enthronization programs such as education for elementary and secondary , line of credit training , and grants for higher education ADDIN EN .CITE Fix7Michael FixLaureen LaglagaronSocial Rights and Citizenship : An International Comparison1-532002August 2002Urban Institutehttp /www .urban .
org /Uploa dedPDF /410545_SocialRights .pdf8 May 2008 (Fix and Laglagaron 2002Citizenship in both countries is each immigrant entering as legal permanent resident or landed immigrant converting followed by citizenship conversion . In for a legal immigrant to be naturalized , two years is the minimum but in the United States , it will tamp down five years of permanent mansion status ADDIN EN .CITE Fix7Michael FixLaureen LaglagaronSocial Rights and Citizenship : An International Comparison1-532002August 2002Urban Institutehttp /www .urban .org /Uploa dedPDF /410545_SocialRights .pdf8 May 2008 (Fix and Laglagaron 2002 . In Australia , immigrants who wanted to for citizenship must pass a exam . The test is not required for people aged below 18 and above 60 , those with hearing and sight impairment , and those with permanent physical and mental incapacity . Entrants who are required to take the test must of course pass the test , a permanent resident , satisfied the residence essential , and with estimable character . However , there are exemptions for the residence requirement if they served in the permanent forces of Australia for three months six months in either navy , army or air force or discharged in service as medically spoiled ADDIN EN .CITE 33312How do...If you want to get a full essay, gild it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment