His325: African American History

Upon the start of the Civil War , the topmost resultant character was non exactly the abolishment or the saving of the debut of thrall because of concerns everyplace honourableity . The primary concern of the politicians of the time were forefinger , especially economic dominanceSlavery , of course , was an essential ingredient in the coevals of the Civil War . The contend would not deport occurred had the institution of thraldom not existed , nor if the blue states had pass overd thrall hardly although thraldom was the big issue , the majority of the population of the grey states that condoned thralldom actually were not slave owners . provided the scrimping of the gray states dep annuled largely on the the like enterprise , and olibanum on the slaves that worked the cotton fields . It was the slave own ers - the rich , including the politicians - that had not bad(p) sake in the issue . The slave owners were aware that the abolition of thralldom would to a fault mean the collapse of the economy of the SouthThe bit was different in the northeasterlyern states : there were the abolitionists , who wanted to end the institution of bondage there were those who supported thraldom , and those who were neutral , or who barely wanted to keep slavery from expanding . Although it was also an issue of godliness during that time , the abolition or preservation of the institution of slavery was primarily an economic concern . The preservation and broadcast of slavery was in the interest of the economy of the Southern states , while the Northern States wanted to keep the spread of slavery in direct , by which they could maintain economic and governmental power over the South (and , secondarily , support their anti-slavery moral stanceFor a tenacious time , until the mid-1800 s , o nly a atomic minority had an expeditious i! nterest in the issue of slavery , mostly politicians and abolitionists . But a growing insecurity over economic and political power brought the issue to national direction . In 1820 , the atomic number 42 agree was enacted .

It was a legislative attain that was in the interest of the North , effectively suppressing the spread of slavery by restrain the practice and introduction of slavery to subscribe to territories However , in 1854 , the Kansas-Nebraska Act rendered null the Missouri Compromise , effectively allowing the spread of slavery into new territories . The Kansas-Nebraska act espoused the construct of Popular sovereignty , where a territory s citizens would decide for themselves whether or not to condone slaveryThe Kansas-Nebraska act brought national awareness to the issue of slavery . Fearing its prejudicial consequences , the North acted decisively Although some middle-ground politicians such(prenominal) as Abraham Lincoln were against slavery , they were against the idea of civil war . However several politicians on both sides became active in their cause Political leadership of the South strove to defend their pay to own slaves , while those of the North , the abolitionists in particular desire to end slavery . Those politicians of the who had the to a greater extent extreme views concerning the economy (and the morality of slavery ) eventually established the civil war , and for plea they...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our p age: write my paper