Case Study

Running head : CITY EASEMENT UTILITY LINEThe reside slip of Mr . Jonesconstructing a subdivision overthe backup city improvement argumentationAbstractThe urban center has every rightly to retrieve its substitute utility take out . It can also take Mr . Jones to demolish the subdivision at his cost . The property owner can at go around recover his payments from Mr . Jones done a court of law , if not by plebeian agreement . The neighbor has no consider of damages on the basis of this episode . Since the matter comes below the jurisdiction of the conjure courts , rather than Federal courts , Mr . Jones has to defend his eluding , if needed through with(predicate) State courtsCase of Mr . JonesEasement of urban center Utility line is active by Mr . Jones subdivision . The city council has every right to ascertain the reflection of sub-division or for that matter to demolish the construction for retrieve the backup man utility line for the public .

level get rid of the cost of such demolishing work has to be borne by Mr . Jones or the property owner as the City ordinary Utility Department has observed in some cases ( Holly , 2008The City is threatening to sue Mr . Jones for fraud against Municipality Mr . Jones can not be charged with an act of fraud . It is true ignorance of law is no excuse (Babstock , 2009 ) But , what Mr . Jones has done can be proved as an unwitting act of ignorance of the fact that the City ease ment utitlity line is under the constructed ! areaThe owner of the subdivision...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper