This is a good solid pcopycatr Try to give more specifics
The evolutionary relationships of Australopithecus and Homo argon even-tempered argued today among top anthropologists. The direct hu piece phylogeny is not certain, and many links to modern man from four jillion years ago are possible. What is not argued, however, is that the evolution of man was an evolution from the neck up, rather than from the neck down. After our rebirth from the arboreal region of Africa to the terrestrial area of the savanna, our physiology below the neck, for the most(prenominal) part, has not changed. As a result, differences among each hominid are not as distinct as some would hope. In example, the comparison between Australopithecus africanus and Homo erectus can be sort as one of degree, not kind. A. africanus, the southern ape of Africa, inhabited the Africa region around 2.6 to 2.0 MYA, while Homo erectus, near man, encompassed the land around 1.6 to about 1/2 MYA. contempt over one million years of evolution, the differences between the devil hominids is limited, and many physical, behavioral, and natural environment adaptations are shared. Instead, a slow, forward evolution of man is represented between A. africanus and Homo erectus.
        During the mid-nineteenth century, the heavy(p) scientist Charles Darwin predicted human evolution to be in Eastern Africa.
sure enough, in 1851 a Dutch anatomist named Eugene Dubois discovered the remains of a hominid at the East African Coast that was classified Homo erectus because of its depiction of bipedalism. Other specimens that represented Homo erectus were excavated in Asia, and the Peking Man for a while, was thought to be the oldest descendent of man (Reader 91). This belief held up for a while until professor Dart found the first fossil of A. africanus at Taung, due south Africa in...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment