Utilitarianism was Origin every last(predicate)y formulated by Jeremy Bentham in the 18th century, and amply developed by John Stewart Mill in the 19th. It Asserts that we should forever act so as to produce the greatest balance of total to evil for everyone concerned with our decision and As with all moral theories, has many strengths and weaknesses.
The prominant criticism of Utilitarianism is that it is extremely with child(p) to indicate the results of an action. The outcomes of all situations are hard to predict, so how can we whitethornhap apply the rule of the greatest happiness for the greatest hail if we do not know who will benefit closely? It is also difficult to decide whether an outcome is morally good or bad. People have contrasting opinions on what they venture is right or wrong and it depends on the individual who is devising the decision. This pee-pees problems because a thing that is good to one person may at the same time be bad to another, angiotensin-converting enzyme mans happiness is another mans pain. Without an absolute definition of happiness, it is hard to commence at a right decision.
Another problem of Utilitarianism is the concept of time. Is long terminus or short term pleasure more worth(predicate)? For example, when deciding whether to take an intensity tablet at a club.
Taking the pill may give you a plenitude of short-term pleasure, but in the long term, it may cause more harm than good. Not taking the tablet would pick out fewer risks and would avoid potential pain. Even here, you cannot predict the results of your decision, as there is no way of telling the effect the ecstasy has on you until you have tried it. Not only is it hard to tell what will be the consequences in the long run,...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment