Comparison and conclusions about the nature of knowledge between knowing a friend and knowing how to swim, knowing a scientific theory and knowing a historical period.

We locoweed compare many things and people only by distributively quality. Contrasting them with their qualities will be at the identical time easy and hard. Comparing a friend with something that is not alive, like subtile how to float are two several(predicate) things. A friend for example is a human beingness as everybody, who will help you anytime you want, give you support, understand and do you. According to Jane Sequichie Hifler, In every man there is something wherein I may contemplate of him, and in that I am his school-age child. We learn from our friends and they learn from us. So it is us who teach each other and let them know of the world we live in.

Knowing how to swimming is fairish something that you can do in the water to touch off within it. It cant help you nor can it know what you are savour in any way. Water also cannot teach you anything nor can you learn from water. When you learn how to swim you teach yourself how and the water it just there. Swimming it just an act of moving through a substance that is not air. Although, swimming allows us to experience a musical composition of the world we are in. it allows us to take part in exploring more than just what our feet can touch.



This allows us to learn and grow from what we learn under the water and how it interacts with what we see or so us. The act of knowing a friend and knowing how to swim are both in turn methods of learning to recover and achieve things in life.

Comparing knowing a friend to knowing a scientific theory shows that they both must be proven. Friends are people who just dont walk up and dead become...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper